![]() ![]() ![]() In particular, both Wright and Barth read the Apostle as reinterpreting traditional ‘monotheistic’ notions of God in light of the incarnation, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ. Spanning the divide between the two thinkers in methodology, specialization, and situation, one finds striking parallels between their respective interpretations of Paul. ![]() Interpreting the theology of Paul, however, is another matter both Barth and Wright have offered creative and provocative readings of the Apostle’s thought. Wright famously has claimed that historical study of Christian origins should be a vital, even constitutive resource for contemporary theology consequently, the Bishop of Durham has criticized Karl Barth and other 20th century theologians for divorcing doctrinal theology from historical scholarship. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |